New Site: Ishmael.org

DQ on Facebook!

FIND OUT ABOUT
What's new
Daniel Quinn
Daniel Quinn's books
Schools & courses
Telephone Conferences
This website
New Tribal Ventures
Ishmael's Annex
Speaking Invitations


THINGS TO DO
Register
Visit Guestbook
Find others
Help us
Order books
Contact us
Telephone Conferences
Special Requests

THINGS TO READ
Essays
Speeches
Dialogues
Parables
Answers to Questions
DQ's suggested reading
DQ's Blog

FOR TEACHERS
The Ishmael Companion
Beyond Civilization
 Study Guide


HOME

  The Ishmael Community: Questions and Answers

The Question...

ID: 83
posted: 16 Feb 1997
updated: 16 Feb 1997

Awhile back I read a question that asked if being a vegetarian wouldn't be a good solution. I thought I understood you to say no. However, as I have talked to vegetarian friends and explored this more, I wonder if not buying meat in stores is a valid aspect of helping to solve the problem. Since so much of the world's agricultural production is tied up with raising and feeding cattle, it would help if people ate less or no commercially raised meat. It's not that eating meat is bad, just that the meat industry is a variation of the agricultural form.

Vegetarianism tends to solve the Malthusian problem ("How are we going to FEED all these people?") but tends to work against solving the Quinnian problem ("How are we going to stop PRODUCING all these people?") Vegetarianism would enable us to FEED more people; it would also enable us to PRODUCE more people. And, yes, the meat industry is "a variation of the agricultural form"---but so is the vegetable industry.


category: I have a bone to pick with you!,I need some clarification
keywords: AGRICULTURE,ANIMALS & ANIMAL RIGHTS,VEGETARIANISM


Go Back OR return to the Questions & Answers OR Browse to the Next Question
Site design and content © 2019, Daniel Quinn
Ishmael Privacy Policy